The green state : rethinking democracy and sovereignty

By R. Eckersley. 2004

485 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/254461276d63135b77cc7acaa4174bf1c917eed6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Daniel Hausknost
2. I. Velicu
3. R. Sabates‐Wheeler
4. Aarti Gupta
5. Stefania Barca
6. J. Sumberg

Citations in the corpus

• Linking agricultural development to school feeding in sub-Saharan Africa: Theoretical perspectives (2011, background): “More recently, the role of public procurement in promoting sustainability, environmental and social agendas has been highlighted in both the North (e.g. Eckersley, 2004; McCrudden, 2004) and the South (Bolton, 2008; Geng and Doberstein, 2008).”
• The environmental state and the glass ceiling of transformation (2020, background): “Scholars tend to draw a distinction between the empirically existing ‘environmental state’ and what they variously call the ‘green state’, ‘eco state’ or ‘sustainability state’ (Eckersley 2004, Meadowcroft 2005, Heinrichs and Laws 2014).”
• The Just Transition and its work of inequality (2020, background): “…put an emphasis on the right to be informed and consulted on available options and guaranteed compensation at full replacement cost for losses (Eckersley 2004), scholars argue that such an approach “commodifies” justice in the language of cheap licenses for development projects to operate…”
• Transparency in Global Environmental Governance: A Coming of Age (2010, background): “For discussion of these trends in global environmental governance, see for example, Bernstein 2002; Newell 2008; and Eckersley 2004.”
• Governing Space: Planning Reform and the Politics of Sustainability (2006, unknown): “Seen in this light, planning is clearly germane to wider debates about the reflexivity of the modern state, in terms of the opening up of democratic and administrative domains and the capacity within government for adaptive learning and change (Eckersley, 2004).”