Public Key Cryptography in Sensor Networks - Revisited
By Gunnar Gaubatz, Jens-Peter Kaps, Berk Sunar. European Workshop on Security in Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks, 2004
339 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2534f124a2cd41b64a41b289bf0dc568a2da32ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jaydip Sen
- Byrav Ramamurthy
- Yanchao Zhang
- Wenjing Lou
- Yuguang Fang
- Nadjib Badache
- V. Varadharajan
- Djamel Djenouri
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Bülent Yener
- Byrav Ramamurthy
- Garhan Attebury
- Yinhai Wang
- Jaydip Sen
- Seyit Ahmet Camtepe
- J. Walters
- Vipin Chaudhary
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- J. Walters
- Jaydip Sen
- Vipin Chaudhary
- Alberto Gotta
- Byrav Ramamurthy
- Prashant Pillai
- Yanchao Zhang
- Wenjing Lou
Citations in the corpus
- Wireless Sensor Network Security: A Survey (2006, background): “This is true in the general case, however, [21], [25], [49], [81] show that it is feasible with the right selection of algorithms.”
- Sensor network security: a survey (2009, neutral): “Others implement cryptography with specific cryptography design in hardware such as [26].”
- A survey of security issues in mobile ad hoc and sensor networks (2005, background): “[110] show that the right selection of employed encryption algorithms and their associated parameters, careful optimization, and low power design techniques can make asymmetric encryption feasible in sensor networks.”
- Securing wireless sensor networks: a survey (2008, methodology): “Gaubatz, Kaps, and Sunar [64] showed the feasibility of implementing the Rabin scheme [65] and the NtruEncrypt scheme [66] on a customized hardware platform.”
- A Survey on Wireless Sensor Network Security (2009, methodology): “For example, the work in [24,45] concentrated on the public key operations only, assuming the private key operations will be performed by a base station or a third party.”
- Location-based compromise-tolerant security mechanisms for wireless sensor networks (2006, background): “However, many researchers [38], [44]–[47] have recently challenged this belief by showing that traditional PKC such as RSA or elliptic-curve cryptography is rather viable in WSNs.”
- A survey of security issues in wireless sensor networks (2006, methodology): “Inspired by the work on public key cryptography [6, 7, 33 , 43], Du et al. investigated the public key authentication problem [85].”
- Wireless sensor network key management survey and taxonomy (2010, background): “However, several research groups (Gura et al., 2004; Watro et al., 2004; Karlofand et al., 2004; Gaubatz et al., 2004) have successfully implemented public-key cryptography in wireless sensor networks.”
- Key distribution mechanisms for wireless sensor networks : a survey (2005, background): “Although there are ongoing works [Malan et al. 2004; Gaubatz et al. 2004; Huang et al. 2003] to customize public key cryptography and elliptic key cryptography for low-power devices, such approaches are still considered as costly due to high processing requirements.”
- Security in Wireless Sensor Networks (2008, neutral): “For instance, Gruteser and Grunwald (2003a) analyze the feasibility of anonymizing location information for location-based services in an automotive telematic environment.”
- Wireless sensor networks: A survey on the state of the art and the 802.15.4 and ZigBee standards (2007, background): “Though some recent work has shown that public key cryptography may be possible to use in sensor networks [126,38,81].”