Concepts Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong

By Christin Wirth. 2016

381 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Against dispositionalism: belief in cognitive science (2018, background): “However, these same problems arise even for de dicto beliefs in Mates cases (see, e.g., Fodor 1998 for discussion).”
Word meaning in minds and machines (2020, background): “Different disciplines have come to very different answers to this question, ranging from a very minimal account of word meaning (e.g., dog means the property of being a dog; Fodor, 1998) to accounts in which there is no demarcation between word meaning and general knowledge (Elman, 2014).”
Predicting the Past from Minimal Traces: Episodic Memory and its Distinction from Imagination and Preservation (2020, unknown): “(Fodor 1998; Hodges 2001; Werning 2004, 2005a; Werning et al. 2012 (eds.)).”