Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816-1992

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research (2005, methodology): “By limiting their temporal domain to the Cold War era, Maoz and Russett made research design choices that are consistent with the arguments of Rosenbaum (1999) and Freedman (1991).”
Testing Nonnested Models of International Relations: Reevaluating Realism (2001, background): “Some, such as Lai and Reiter (2000), check the robustness of their results across covariates and functional forms and hence fall into two categories.”
An Econometric Model of Network Formation With Degree Heterogeneity (2017, methodology): “It augments a standard dyadic model of link formation, as used by, for example, Fafchamps and Gubert (2007), Lai and Reiter (2000), Apicella et al. (2012), and Attanasio et al. (2012), with agent-specific unobserved degree heterogeneity.”
Complex Dependencies in the Alliance Network (2012, methodology): “…theoretical effects of dyadic attributes such as joint democracy (Leeds, 1999; Lai and Reiter, 2000; Gibler and Wolford, 2006), conflict histories (Lai and Reiter, 2000), geographic contiguity/ proximity (Gibler and Vasquez, 1998; Gibler and Wolford, 2006), and trade (Rosecrance, 1986; Keohane…”
The Costs of Reneging (2008, methodology): “Each of these measures was coded using data from the ten years prior to each dyad-year (Lai and Reiter 2000, 214).”