Testing Nonnested Models of International Relations: Reevaluating Realism

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Estimating the gravity model when zero trade flows are frequent and economically determined (2015, methodology): “Following Clark (2001)26 we define Kn, the degrees of freedom correction, as follows: 18360 18360 =9.81793 (***) where p=16, q= 14and N=18360 are the number of estimated coefficients in the ET-Tobit model and the Heckman model and the number of observations, respectively.”
The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research (2005, background): “A criminally short review of the literature would include estimated risk criteria such as Mallows C p (Mallows, 1973), information theoretic model selection criteria such as AIC (Akaike, 1973) and BIC (Schwarz, 1978) Stein-like shrinkage estimators (Stein, 1955), various nonnested tests (Cox, 1961; ”
The misuse of the Vuong test for non-nested models to test for zero-inflation (2015, unknown): “Clarke (2001) observes that “Defining the concept of ‘non-nested’ precisely is not an easy task. Definitions are often imprecise and uncomplicated or precise and complicated.” A statement that applies equally well to nested models. (Indeed one category is not the complement of the other, there exist”