Spoken Natural Language Dialog Systems: A Practical Approach

By Ronnie W. Smith, D. R. Hipp. 1994

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Simple Language Model for Task-Oriented Dialogue (2020, neutral): “They often use a pipeline approach [46, 58].”
BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation (2020, background): “, 2017) dialog (Smith and Hipp, 1994; Vinyals and Le, 2015) and image captioning (Fang et al.”
Information state and dialogue management in the TRINDI dialogue move engine toolkit (2000, background): “While any well-designed system (e.g. Smith and Hipp 1994; Walker et al. 1998) should allow a range of experimentation of different parameters, it is much more difficult to compare different systems or approaches to the same phenomena.”
Speech-Graphics Dialogue Systems (1997, methodology): “Our project uses a hybrid Prolog-like planner (Smith and Hipp, 1994) which first attempts to prove the top-most goal and then initiates interactions with the user when the proof cannot easily be achieved.”
POMDP-Based Statistical Spoken Dialog Systems: A Review (2013, background): “SPOKEN dialogue systems (SDS) allow users to interact with a wide variety of information systems using speech as the primary, and often the only, communication medium [1], [2], [3].”