Booms, Busts, and Fraud
By Paul Povel, Rajdeep Singh, Andrew Winton. 2007
295 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24a25a3788277df1e780955bb640ccadb9a0cf60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Determinants of Operational Risk in U.S. Financial Institutions (2011, background): “On the one hand, we may expect to see a higher incidence of fraud during good times (Povel, Singh, and Winton (2007)).”
- Evidence on Contagion in Earnings Management (2015, unknown): “As discussed in Povel et al. (2007), the higher the growth opportunities in the industry, the greater are likely to be the gains from earnings management.”
- The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Financial Reporting on Peer Firms’ Investments (2013, unknown): “For example, Povel et al. (2007) model the fraud dynamic and demonstrate that fraud is related to the business cycle, although not monotonically.”
- Is Bitcoin Really Untethered? (2020, background): “One line of thinking is that more fraud exists in economic booms because individuals monitor their investments relatively less closely (Povel, Singh, and Winton (2007)).”
- Corporate Fraud and Business Conditions: Evidence from IPOs (2010, methodology): “…between the ex ante probability of fraud and investor belief is summarized in the following figure (Figure 4 in Povel et al. (2007)).2 Whereas Povel et al. (2007) argue that investor beliefs affect fraud propensity by altering investors’ monitoring incentives, Hertzberg (2005) argues that…”
- Asset Quality Misrepresentation by Financial Intermediaries: Evidence from the RMBS Market: Asset Quality Misrepresentation by Financial Intermediaries (2015, unknown): “This finding is consistent with models in Povel, Singh, and Winton (2007) and Hartman-Glaser (2013), who predict that misrepresentations are more likely to occur during good times and can occur among institutions with high perceived reputation.”
- Why 'Good' Firms Do Bad Things: The Effects of High Aspirations, High Expectations and Prominence on the Incidence of Corporate Illegality (2010, unknown): “, 2009) or why firms might engage in illegal actions during “good times” (Povel et al., 2007).”