Corporate Fraud and Business Conditions: Evidence from IPOs

By T. Wang, Andrew Winton, Xiaoyun Yu. 2010

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/503467dbe10786cc7c4794e86976b3834b2bef18

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Gerard Hoberg
2. K. Hanley
3. Jonathan R. Karlsen
4. Sean Foley
5. Tālis J. Putniņš
6. Gordon M. Phillips
7. Kenneth R. Ahern
8. L. Gu

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jonathan R. Karlsen
2. Sean Foley
3. Tālis J. Putniņš
4. Andrew Urquhart
5. Emmanouil Platanakis

Citations in the corpus

• Sex, Drugs, and Bitcoin: How Much Illegal Activity Is Financed through Cryptocurrencies? (2019, methodology): “Since its development by Feinstein (1989, 1990), DCE models have been applied to various financial misconduct settings including tax evasion (Feinstein, 1991), corporate fraud (Wang et al., 2010), and market manipulation (Comerton-Forde and Putniņš, 2014).”
• Litigation Risk, Strategic Disclosure and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings (2012, background): “3 Wang, Winton, and Yu (2010) find that fraud (lawsuit incidence) is related to investors’ beliefs about future business conditions.”
• The Market for Financial Adviser Misconduct (2016, unknown): “…of misconduct in the mortgage industry, and numerous papers have documented similar evidence of corporate fraud including Povel, Sign, and Winton (2007), Dyck, Morse, and Zingales (2010, 2014), Wang, Winton, and Yu (2010), Parsons, Sulaeman, and Titman (2014), and Khanna, Kim, and Lu (2015).”