Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration

By Ian J. Bateman, Daniel Kahneman, A. Munro, C. Starmer, Robert Sugden. 2005

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24a22ca7d86afa6967ff1eec324a9b5c77f67000

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Mei Wang
2. Jacinto Braga
3. Bruno De Borger
4. Colin F. Camerer
5. Marc Oliver Rieger
6. Thorsten Hens
7. Mogens Fosgerau
8. C. Starmer

In General Decision Sciences

1. Mei Wang
2. Teck-Hua Ho
3. Jacinto Braga
4. Noah Lim
5. Colin F. Camerer
6. Marc Oliver Rieger
7. Thorsten Hens
8. C. Starmer

In Safety Research

1. Teck-Hua Ho
2. Noah Lim
3. Colin F. Camerer
4. Mei Wang
5. Jacinto Braga
6. C. Starmer
7. Shane Frederick
8. Marc Oliver Rieger

Citations in the corpus

• Risk Preferences Around the World (2015, background): “As one anonymous referee noted, WTP may be interpreted as loss and can lead to a higher degree of risk aversion because of loss aversion (Bateman et al. 2005).”
• Modeling the Psychology of Consumer and Firm Behavior with Behavioral Economics (2006, background): “Outcomes are evaluated as changes with respect to a reference point.”
• A Reference Price Theory of the Endowment Effect (2012, background): “Our model also informs the debate over whether buyers experience loss aversion for the money given up in purchases (see Bateman et al. 1997; Bateman et al. 2005; Novemsky and Kahneman 2005; Tversky and Kahneman 1991).”
• Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research (2018, unknown): “(The concept of adversarial collaboration—two sets of researchers with opposing theories coming together and agreeing on a way to test hypotheses before observing the data—is often associated with Daniel Kahneman, see, for example Bateman et al. 2005).”
• Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis (2005, background): “As in Bateman et al. (2005), it looks as though subjects responded to choice-based matching as if it were a valuation task.”
• The trade-off between money and travel time: A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences (2008, background): “Importantly, they imply the relative sizes for the WTP, WTA, EG and EL that would be predicted by the theory of reference-dependence (Bateman et al. (1997); see also section 2 above).”