Evaluation methodologies for transport projects in the United Kingdom

By R. Vickerman. 2000

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/248fecd996b8c659de396a356b92d7f98bd3023d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jerry Olsson
2. Mark Thurstain-Goodwin
3. David Banister
4. Taotao Deng

In Transportation

1. Jerry Olsson
2. Mark Thurstain-Goodwin
3. David Banister

Citations in the corpus

• Improved road accessibility and indirect development effects: evidence from rural Philippines (2009, methodology): “Others have called for the consideration to include wider, indirect, economic effects of road projects going beyond the effects captured by cost–benefit analysis (CBA) (Linneker and Spence, 1996; Transport Policy, 2000; Vickerman, 2000; SOU, 2003; Banister and Berechman, 2003; Olsson, 2006).”
• Quantification of the non-transport benefits resulting from rail investment (2011, background): “Table 2 summarises some of the main issues in rail appraisal in the UK, but more detail can be found in Vickerman (2000) and Simmonds and Banister (2007).”