Mixcoin: Anonymity for Bitcoin with Accountable Mixes

By Joseph Bonneau, Arvind Narayanan, Andrew K. Miller, Jeremy Clark, Joshua A. Kroll, Edward W. Felten. Financial Cryptography, 2014

469 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/244ddba27efef35bac9b01d5b1780922f5f33ec4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues (2019, unknown): “Examples implementing such technique are Mixcoin (Bonneau et al., 2014), which is also able to detect dishonest transaction behaviours, and Coinjoin (Maxwell et al., 2013) or CoinShuffle (Ruffing et al., 2014), that uses a third party to shuffle output addresses.”
A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues of Bitcoin (2017, background): “[160] propose MixCoin, a third-party mixing protocol to facilitate anonymous payments in Bitcoin and similar cryptocurrencies.”
Zether: Towards Privacy in a Smart Contract World (2020, methodology): “) CoinShuffle [81] and Mixcoin [13] are mixing protocols for Bitcoin.”
Applications of Blockchains in the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey (2019, background): “Mixcoin is a service that attempts to mitigate malicious behavior while performing address mixing [241].”
Blockchain (2020, background): “Privacy implications of Bitcoin have also been discussed by other authors (e.g., Androulaki et al. 2013; Bonneau et al. 2014; Miers et al. 2013).”
An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends (2017, methodology): “Mixcoin [43] provides a simple method to avoid dishonest behaviours.”
TumbleBit: An Untrusted Bitcoin-Compatible Anonymous Payment Hub (2017, methodology): “Our proofs use the real/ideal paradigm in the random oracle model (ROM) and security relies on the standard RSA assumption and the unforgeability of ECDSA signatures.”
SoK: Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies (2015, methodology): “CoinJoin [74] Direct Buyer/Seller O(n) O(n) k 1 Mixcoin [23] Auditable Buyer/Seller O(n) O(n) k 1 Cross-chain exch.”
Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey (2018, methodology): “Mixcoin [20] provides a simple method to avoid dishonest behaviours.”
Proofs-of-delay and randomness beacons in Ethereum (2017, methodology): “It has also been used in several Bitcoin-based protocols [9, 15].”
Blockchain Technologies for the Internet of Things: Research Issues and Challenges (2018, background): “2014 Mixcoin [62] - Cryptographic accountability - Randomized mixing fees - Anonymity”
The price of anonymity: empirical evidence from a market for Bitcoin anonymization (2017, methodology): “It does not use mixing protocols such as Xim [27], CoinShuffle [28], CoinParty [29], or Mixcoin [30] that maintain decentralization, include defenses against Sybil attacks, or at least provide warranties.”
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019, methodology): “To cope with these challenges, some proposals for blockchain such as mixers services [22], [23] try to pro-”
A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things (2018, background): “To tackle these issues different proposals suggested exposing theft through an accountability mechanism [171] or hiding the input/output”
Bitcoin and Beyond: A Technical Survey on Decentralized Digital Currencies (2016, methodology): “[Bonneau et al. 2014] proposes a mixing service design named Mixcoin 5 .”
How to Use Bitcoin to Design Fair Protocols (2014, background): “[86] A.”