Proofs-of-delay and randomness beacons in Ethereum
By Benedikt Bünz, Steven Goldfeder, Joseph Bonneau. 2017
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More (2018, methodology): “This can be further improved by using an interactive referee delegation model [CRR11], previously proposed for other blockchain applications [BGB17,TR].”
- Ekiden: A Platform for Confidentiality-Preserving, Trustworthy, and Performant Smart Contracts (2018, background): “TEEbased computation in Ekiden provides confidentiality, enabling efficient use of powerful cryptographic primitives that a TEE is known to emulate, such as functional encryption [29] and black-box obfuscation [58], and also provides a trustworthy source of randomness, a major acknowledged difficult”
- An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms (2019, unknown): “Based on [42], [43] proposed a multi-round protocol to verify delay functions using a refereed delegation model.”
- Arbitrum: Scalable, private smart contracts (2018, background): “8 Ethereum’s global gas limit is a significant limitation that makes many computations – that would take just seconds to execute on a modern CPU – unachievable [8, 24].”
- The Ekiden Platform for Confidentiality-Preserving, Trustworthy, and Performant Smart Contracts (2020, background): “3 To address the availability and network security limitations of TEEs, Ekiden supports on-chain checkpointing and (optional) storage of contract state and thereby supports safe interaction among long-lived smart contracts across different trust domains.”