Testing for Measurement Equivalence in Surveys Dimensions of Social Trust across Cultural Contexts

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers (2016, background): “Trust judgments are complex and differ for different categories of trustees (Freitag & Bauer, 2013).”
Ethically Minded Consumer Behavior:Scale Review, Development, and Validation (2016, unknown): “Consequently, because results assure full metric invariance, an increase of one unit in the latent variable would have the same meaning for all samples being compared (Freitag and Bauer, 2013); thus, the scale is ready for use across nations.”
A comprehensive view of trust in education: Conclusions from a systematic literature review (2020, background): “Unlike Freitag and Bauer (2013) who statistically confirm the cross-cultural significance of trust and its dimensions (Freitag & Bauer, 2013, 40; alike: Andr e, 2014; Schneider, 2017), Sturgis et al. (2010), based on a ‘think aloud’ methodology, found that trust levels vary according to the…”
Growing to Trust (2015, background): “…behavioral trust measures (e.g., Glaeser, Laibson, Scheinkman, & Soutter, 2000), (2) more sophisticated multi-item measures of generalized interpersonal trust exist (e.g., Rotter, 1967), and (3) trust measures may not always show cross-cultural equivalence (for a review see Freitag & Bauer, 2013).”