Phenotypic Differences Between vacuma and transposa subpopulations of Botrytis cinerea

By F. Martinez, D. Blancard, P. Lecomte, C. Levis, B. Dubos, M. Fermaud. European journal of plant pathology, 2003

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Taxonomy and Genetic Variation of Botrytis and Botryotinia (2007, background): “Usually they are grouped as mycelial, sporulating (conidial) and sclerotial (Jarvis, 1977; Lorbeer, 1980), but sub-types can be recognised (Faretra et al., 1988; Martinez et al., 2003).”
Grape berry skin features related to ontogenic resistance to Botrytis cinerea (2009, unknown): “These single-spore isolates have been characterised as belonging to the II-transposa type, in the Group-II clade, and their phenotypic features have been described previously ( Martinez et al. 2003, 2008 ).”
One stop shop: backbones trees for important phytopathogenic genera: I (2014) (2014, background): “Botrytis cinerea not only has a broad host range, but also shows considerable phenotypic variability in vegetative growth, conidiation and sclerotium formation (Kerssies et al. 1997; Martinez et al. 2003; Schumacher et al. 2013).”