Relevance Communication And Cognition

By Ines Gloeckner. 2016

2,446 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23dfef545b41f3c195c6848b0e3712b222ac3abb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

How Gullible are We? A Review of the Evidence from Psychology and Social Science (2017, background): “In the process of understanding linguistic communication receivers have to tap into their background beliefs (e.g., Kintsch, 1994; Sperber & Wilson, 1995).”
On Integrating Discourse in Machine Translation (2017, background): “…textual, pragmatic equivalence), Hatim and Mason (1990)’s view of the translator as a communicator and mediator and the Relevance theory of Sperber and Wilson (1986).1 Essentially nowadays there is 1Cognitive Linguistics is a further development which is broad agreement on the…”
Decontextualization: Making Sentences Stand-Alone (2021, background): “Our concept of "truth conditional meaning" is very close to "explicature" as used in Relevance Theory (Sperber and Wilson, 1986).”
Ad-hoc Implicature in Preschool Children (2015, background): “While some theories emphasize the differences in computation between these types of implicature (e.g., Levinson, 2000), others minimize them (e.g., Sperber & Wilson, 1986).”
Investigating scalar implicatures in a truth-value judgement task: evidence from event-related brain potentials (2016, background): “The proponents of the other approach (Bott & Noveck, 2004; Breheny, Katsos, & Williams, 2006) postulate that scalar implicatures result from complex and global reasoning processes that are based on context or assumptions regarding the speaker’s intentions (Carston, 1998; Sperber and Wilson, 1986).”
What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy? (2022, background): “, politeness theory or relevance theory [10, 89]) also rely heavily on context, making their application to NLP systems challenging.”
Minireview The Neural Basis of Mentalizing (unknown): “Communicative intentions are perceived when someone calls our name or makes eye contact (Sperber and Wilson, 1995).”
Teaching with Rewards and Punishments: Reinforcement or Communication? (2015, background): “In contrast, peoples’ understanding of communicative intent when learning new concepts from examples (Sperber & Wilson, 1986; Csibra & Gergely, 2009; Shafto et al., 2014) suggests an action-feedback model in which teachers expect learners to treat responses communicatively or as commentary about an…”
Pragmatic reasoning through semantic inference (2016, background): “Second, in the decades since Grice's original work there has been a persistent drive toward conceptual unification of Grice's original maxims into a smaller set of principles (e.g., Horn 1984, Levinson 2000, Sperber & Wilson 1986).”
Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues (2017, background): “, Gibbs 2008; Lakoff and Johnson 1980, 1999; Ortony 1979/1993). One issue is whether conceptual metaphors that have been shown to exist in thought independently of language use (e. g., Gibbs 2013) can be shown to in fact drive utterance production and reception in language use by means of on-line cr”
How to Do Things with Emotional Expressions: The Theory of Affective Pragmatics (2017, background): “…could rely on conventions that are not linguistic, as we do when we raise one’s middle finger or pull an imaginary toilet cord while closing one’s nostrils to provide evidence about what we intend to 10An alternative is the so-called code model of linguistic communication (Sperber & Wilson, 1986).”
Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference. (2016, unknown): “Formalization of the Gricean notion of implicature using the maxims is difficult, however, and many post-Gricean theories have instead proposed alternative sets of principles [71, 53].”