Dynamics in social organization of bonobos (Pan paniscus)

By G. Hohmann, B. Fruth. 2002

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23b3320775930e3c503d5501f711c246d163477b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Grouping Patterns and Competition Among Female Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda (2008, unknown): “The levels of association within female cliques are comparable to the association levels among Taï females in West Africa (Boesch and BoeschAchermann 2000; Wittig and Boesch 2003), which are highly gregarious, forming stable bonds and friendships (Boesch and Boesch-Achermann 2000), and to Lomako bon”
Culture in Bonobos? Between‐Species and Within‐Species Variation in Behavior1 (2003, background): “The pattern occurred during all the community encounters that were observed (N p 23) (Hohmann and Fruth 2002).”
The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression (2012, background): “Intergroup interactions between bonobos are also less aggressive than those among chimpanzees even though, like chimpanzees, bonobos are territorial and can have hostile intergroup interactions in which males and females display at members of neighbouring groups (Kano 1992; Hohmann & Fruth 2002).”
Social dynamics among females and their influence on social structure in an East African chimpanzee community (2013, unknown): “…& Boesch 2003), which are highly gregarious and form stable bonds and friendships (Boesch & Boesch-Achermann 2000; Lehmann & Boesch 2008), and to those of bonobo females at Lomako (Hohmann & Fruth 2002), which are characterized by high cohesion and affiliation (Idani 1991; White 1996; Table 2).”