Culture in Bonobos? Between‐Species and Within‐Species Variation in Behavior1
By G. Hohmann, B. Fruth. Current Anthropology, 2003
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d333c57f8ff56a7cc1aaeba2403a74e50ceb38ab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
- Brian Hare
- Victoria Wobber
- R. Wrangham
- Michael Tomasello
- Martin N. Muller
- John C. Mitani
- J. Call
- M. Wilson
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Brian Hare
- Victoria Wobber
- R. Wrangham
- Martin N. Muller
- John C. Mitani
- M. Wilson
- Monica L. Wakefield
In Social Psychology
- R. Wrangham
- Victoria Wobber
- Brian Hare
- Michael Tomasello
- Martin N. Muller
- J. Call
- A. Melis
- John C. Mitani
Citations in the corpus
- A comparison of bonobo and chimpanzee tool use: evidence for a female bias in the Pan lineage (2010, unknown): “First, bonobos may have lost tool use in the wild, not because they are cognitively incapable but because all relevant food sources can be acquired without the help of artefacts (McGrew et al. 1997: hypothesis 8; Hohmann & Fruth 2003).”
- The self-domestication hypothesis: evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression (2012, background): “…at relatively low intensity; unlike chimpanzees, bonobos do not express dominance through formal signals and have very low-intensity displays relative to those of chimpanzees (Kano 1992; Parish 1996; Furuichi 1997; Vervaecke et al. 1999, 2000a, b; Hohmann & Fruth 2003a, b; Paoli et al. 2006).”