On the critical values of the standard normal homogeneity test (SNHT)

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison between the peaks-over-threshold method and the annual maximum method for flood frequency analysis (2014, methodology): “Critical values provided by Sahin and Cigizoglu (2010) were used for the Von Neumann test and critical levels calculated by Khaliq and Ouarda (2007) were applied with the standard normal homogeneity test.”
Assessment of global warming on the island of Tenerife, Canary Islands (Spain). Trends in minimum, maximum and mean temperatures since 1944 (2012, background): “SNHT only marks the first inhomogeneity it finds from the earliest data onwards (Khaliq and Ouarda 2007), so the repetition of the test each time a change was introduced was particularly necessary.”
A note on the use of the standard normal homogeneity test to detect inhomogeneities in climatic time series (2011, background): “Khaliq and Ouarda (2007) extended these critical values from 10 to 50 000.”