Comparison between the peaks-over-threshold method and the annual maximum method for flood frequency analysis

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula function: a case study of the Litija station on the Sava River (2015, methodology): “In all three cases, distribution parameters were estimated with the method of L-moments, which produced better test results than the method of moments or the maximum likelihood method (Šraj et al., 2012; Bezak et al., 2014).”
Flood frequency analysis of river swat using Log Pearson type 3, Generalized Extreme Value, Normal, and Gumbel Max distribution methods (2018, methodology): “Distribution parameters can be estimated by maximum likelihood estimators, method of moments (MOM), or by methods of L-Moments (Bezak et al. 2014; Kamal et al. 2016).”
Nonstationary frequency analysis of extreme daily precipitation amounts in Southeastern Canada using a peaks-over-threshold approach (2017, methodology): “Indeed, the POT classical approach requires that events be independent and identically distributed by a GPD (Bezak et al. 2014; Lang et al. 1999; Osman et al. 2013; Pujol et al. 2007; Sugahara et al. 2009).”