Achieving Accurate Pictures of Risk and Identifying Gender Responsive Needs: Two New Assessments for Women Offenders 1

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

General Risk and Need, Gender Specificity, and the Recidivism of Female Offenders (2010, methodology): “Perhaps the most direct test of the gender-responsive versus gender-neutral risk factor debate was performed by Van Voorhis et al. (2008) in an investigation of the predictive validity of both gender-neutral and gender-responsive risk and need instruments across different settings (prison,…”
Gender Matters: An Introduction to the Special Issues on Women and Girls (2016, methodology): “However, research has found that women with dependent children recidivate more often, particularly if they also have problems relating to poverty, social support, and substances (Greene et al., 2000; van Voorhis et al., 2008).”
Gendered Pathways (2009, background): “…data on women offenders from four correctional jurisdictions between 2003 and 2007 and found that many gender-responsive needs were predictive of women’s institutional and community risk (Van Voorhis et al., 2008; see also Salisbury et al., in press; Wright, Salisbury, & Van Voorhis, 2007).”