Covert and overt orienting of attention to emotional faces in anxiety

By B. Bradley, K. Mogg, Neil Millar. 2000

420 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2352d175a2a02d29484f009863453e74a9589316

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: Different Treatments, Similar Mechanisms? (2008, background): “Attentional biases toward threat differentiate nonanxious and anxious individuals (e.g., Asmundson et al., 1992; Bradley et al., 1998, 1999, 2000) and there is initial evidence to support a causal role of attentional biases in the etiology of anxiety and emotional reactivity (MacLeod et al., 2002,…”
Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling (2005, background): “Enduring biases, associations, and emotional habits have been well documented in emotion research (e.g., Bradley et al. 2000; Mathews & McLeod 1994).”
Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. (2012, background): “…et al. (2010) 23 25 48 OCD Analogue 18.30% Face 2 5.5° Event Event Armstrong et al. (2012) 19 20 39 OCD Analogue 33.00% Picture 4 7° Event Event Bradley et al. (2000) – – 23 SAD Analogue − Face 2 2.6° Event – Buckner et al. (2010) 23 23 46 SAD Analogue −6.20% Face 4 n/a Epoch Epoch Calvo and…”
Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety (2008, methodology): “Neuroscientific evidence is mounting for separate systems for top-down and bottom-up processing (e.g., Corbetta & Shulman, 2002), and the current behavioural evidence suggests that anxious individuals may experience decreased inhibitory control over attention to threat-relevant stimuli, which…”
Reliability of two versions of the dot-probe task using photographic faces (2009, background): “Attentional bias is a cornerstone in two influential cognitive models of social anxiety, namely those of Clark and Wells (1995) and Rapee and Heimberg (1997), where it is hypothesized to be a maintaining factor. According to Clark and Wells, avoidance of threatening social cues (such as angry facial”
Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures: Motivationally Biased Attention (2004, background): “trait anxiety (Rohner, 2002), social anxiety (Bradley et al., 2000), specific phobia (Hermans et al.”