GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibrium
By Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, Sepp Hochreiter. 2017
18,997 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Generative Models, Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Generative Models
- Stefano Ermon
- Jun-Yan Zhu
- Arash Vahdat
- Richard Zhang
- Eli Shechtman
- Jiaming Song
- Karsten Kreis
- Daniel Cohen-Or
In Optimization & Training
- Yoshua Bengio
- Quoc V. Le
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Sergey Levine
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Frank Hutter
- Pieter Abbeel
- Aaron C. Courville
Citations in the corpus
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (2020, methodology): “On CIFAR10, we calculated Inception and FID scores on 50000 samples using the original code from the OpenAI [48] and TTUR [19] repositories, respectively.”
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models (2021, methodology): “6, we compare models trained on CelebAHQ [38] and ImageNet in terms sampling speed for different numbers of denoising steps with the DDIM sampler [81] and plot it against FID-scores [28].”
- Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents (2022, methodology): “Finally, in Figure 10 we compute MS-COCO zero-shot FID [23] while sweeping over guidance scale for both unCLIP and GLIDE, finding that guidance hurts the FID of unCLIP much less so than for GLIDE.”
- A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmark (2019, background): “Generative Evaluation Evaluation of generative quality is a difficult goal with numerous proxy metrics, such as reconstruction error, FID (Heusel et al., 2017), IS (Salimans et al.”
- Scaling Autoregressive Video Models (2019, methodology): “This is the spatiotemporal counterpart to the Fréchet Inception Distance [16], replacing the ImageNet-trained Inception network of the latter with an I3D Network trained on Kinetics.”
- Natural Adversarial Examples (2019, positive): “The Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) [31] enables us to de-”
- Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Study (2017, methodology): “Fréchet Inception Distance is computed by considering the difference in embedding of true and fake data [11].”
- Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation (2021, methodology): “We evaluate our model zero-shot by comparing it to three prior approaches: AttnGAN (Xu et al., 2018), DMGAN (Zhu et al., 2019), and DF-GAN (Tao et al., 2020), the last of which reports the best Inception Score (Salimans et al., 2016) and Fréchet Inception Distance (Heusel et al., 2017) on MS-COCO.”
- Evaluating Lossy Compression Rates of Deep Generative Models (2020, background): “One of the main drawbacks of the IS or FID is that they can only provide a single scalar value that cannot distinguish the mode dropping behavior from the mode inventing behavior in generative models.”
- Improved Techniques for Training Score-Based Generative Models (2020, methodology): “[9] noticed that adding an extra denoising step after the original annealed Langevin dynamics in [1], similar to [10, 11, 12], often significantly improves FID scores [13] without affecting the visual appearance of samples.”
- Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Data (2020, methodology): “The bolded numbers indicate the lowest FID and highest Recall for each training set size.”
- Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like One (2019, methodology): “First we note that both IS and FID are scores computed based on a pretrained classifier network, and thus can be very dependent on the exact model/code repository used.”
- Flow Contrastive Estimation of Energy-Based Models (2019, methodology): “To evaluate the fidelity of synthesized examples, Table 1 summarizes the Fr´echet Inception Distance (FID) [24] of the synthesized examples computed with the Inception V3 [65] classifier.”
- Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution (2019, methodology): “1, we compute inception and FID scores based on a total of 50000 samples.”
- Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2 (2019, methodology): “The two most common metrics for comparing GANs are Inception Score [34] and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) [13].”
- Learning Non-Convergent Non-Persistent Short-Run MCMC Toward Energy-Based Model (2019, background): “Table 1 (a) compares the Inception Score (IS) [45, 4] and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) [20] with Inception v3 classifier [47] on 40 , 000 generated examples.”
- A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks (2018, positive): “Table 1 gives Fréchet inception distances (FID) [24] for various generator architectures in CelebA-HQ [28] and our new FFHQ dataset (Appendix A).”
- Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis (2018, background): “A variety of works have proposed heuristics for measuring the sample quality of models without tractable likelihoods (Salimans et al., 2016; Heusel et al., 2017; Bińkowski et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2017).”