Evaluating Lossy Compression Rates of Deep Generative Models
By Sicong Huang, Alireza Makhzani, Yanshuai Cao, Roger Baker Grosse. 2020
30 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The field of deep generative modeling has succeeded in producing astonishingly realistic-seeming images and audio, but quantitative evaluation remains a challenge. Log-likelihood is an appealing metric due to its grounding in statistics and information theory, but it can be challenging to estimate for implicit generative models, and scalar-valued metrics give an incomplete picture of a model's quality. In this work, we propose to use rate distortion (RD) curves to evaluate and compare deep generative models. While estimating RD curves is seemingly even more computationally demanding than log-likelihood estimation, we show that we can approximate the entire RD curve using nearly the same computations as were previously used to achieve a single log-likelihood estimate. We evaluate lossy compression rates of VAEs, GANs, and adversarial autoencoders (AAEs) on the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets. Measuring the entire RD curve gives a more complete picture than scalar-valued metrics, and we arrive at a number of insights not obtainable from log-likelihoods alone.
Subfields: Generative Models, Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Generative Models
- Jonathan Ho
- Pieter Abbeel
- Stefano Ermon
- Ajay Jain
- Sergey Levine
- Arash Vahdat
- Yang Song
- Mohammad Norouzi
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
Citations in the corpus
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (2020, methodology): “Our rate-distortion curves are computed over time in one evaluation of the variational bound, reminiscent of how rate-distortion curves can be computed over distortion penalties in one run of annealed importance sampling [24].”