Parameterisation and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment

486 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling (2013, background): “Using observable input variables will often increase the perceived reliability of the models (Pollino et al., 2007b; Borsuk et al., 2004).”
Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas (2012, methodology): “One aspect to be developed is formalizing some methods for the sensibility analysis of a model in order to investigate its robustness according to the problem studied (Pollino, 2007).”
Forecasting the relative influence of environmental and anthropogenic stressors on polar bears (2016, methodology): “To the extent practicable, we represented uncertainty in the estimation of probabilities associated with individual nodes (Marcot et al. 2006, Marcot 2007, Pollino et al. 2007).”
Mental models for conservation research and practice (2019, background): “The networks are used to calculate how probable an event is, and can be confirmed or adapted on the basis of empirical observations or external interventions on particular system variables that can be collected over time (e.g., Pollino et al., 2007).”