Community structure of pollination webs of Mauritian heathland habitats

By C. Kaiser‐Bunbury, J. Memmott, C. Müller. 2009

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22fbbe6ae8ac3cb416601dd25161eb8d0c920f30

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Collateral effects of beekeeping: Impacts on pollen-nectar resources and wild bee communities (2016, background): “…that A. mellifera is routinely reported as a 71 dominant species in plant-pollinator networks worldwide, even in studies conducted in natural 72 habitats (Forup et al. 2008, Bosch et al. 2009, Kaiser-Bunbury et al. 2009, Valido et al. 2014; 73 see Davila & Wardle 2008 for a rare exception).”
Adaptive foraging allows the maintenance of biodiversity of pollination networks (2013, methodology): “To evaluate the effect of AF on the dynamics of pollination networks, we simulated the time evolution of a network from an oceanic island published by Kaiser-Bunbury et al. (2009), which to our knowledge is the network built with field data of the highest resolution.”
Global patterns of mainland and insular pollination networks (2016, background): “…darwinii and Mausoleopsis aldabraensis (Linsley et al., 1966; Woodell, 1979), and make the establishment of highly generalized species (super-generalists) easier in island than in mainland communities (Olesen et al., 2002; Kaiser-Bunbury et al., 2009; Padrón et al., 2009; Traveset et al., 2013).”
Conservation and restoration of plant–animal mutualisms on oceanic islands (2010, background): “…areas in Mauritius creates a lot of initial disturbance (A; compare right-hand side, weeded area with left-hand side, unweeded area), it rapidly results in an increase in interactions between native plants and native flower visitors, compared to non-weeded areas (Kaiser-Bunbury et al., 2009).”