Adaptive foraging allows the maintenance of biodiversity of pollination networks

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, background): “…species can potentially ‘rewire’ the network by switching to alternate plant 586 species following extirpation of a partner pollinator species, thereby maintaining the overall 587 community cohesion (Figure 2; Kaiser-Bunbury et al., 2010; Ramos-Jiliberto et al., 2012; 588 Valdovinos et al., 2013).”
Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations (2017, background): “…(Bascompte et al. 2003, Thébault & Fontaine 2010, Rohr et al. 2014), following the logic of the structure-driven view that community composition follows from network structure, without any substantial external control through habitat, climate, or resources (but see Valdovinos et al. 2013).”
Massively Introduced Managed Species and Their Consequences for Plant–Pollinator Interactions (2017, background): “…favour species persistence and community stability (Rohr et al., 2014; Th ebault and Fontaine, 2010), but it could also decrease species diversity if competition between pollinators for resources and between plants for pollinator access is important (Benadi et al., 2012; Valdovinos et al., 2013).”