Multi-frequency analysis of neutralino dark matter annihilations in the Coma cluster

By Sergio Colafrancesco, S. Profumo, P. Ullio. 2005

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study the astrophysical implications of neutralino dark matter annihilations in galaxy clusters, with a specific application to the Coma cluster. We first address the determination of the dark halo models for Coma, starting from structure formation models and observational data, and we discuss in detail the role of sub-halos. We then perform a thorough analysis of the transport and diffusion properties of neutralino annihilation products, and investigate the resulting multi-frequency signals, from radio to gamma-ray frequencies. We also study other relevant astrophysical effects of neutralino annihilations, like the DM-induced Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect and the intracluster gas heating. As for the particle physics setup, we adopt a two-fold approach, resorting both to model-independent bottom-up scenarios and to benchmark, GUT-motivated frameworks. We show that the Coma radio-halo data (the spectrum and the surface brightness) can be nicely fitted by the neutralino-induced signal for peculiar particle physics models and for magnetic field values, which we outline in detail. Fitting the radio data and moving to higher frequencies, we find that the multi-frequency spectral energy distributions are typically dim at EUV and X-ray frequencies (with respect to the data), but show a non-negligible gamma-ray emission, depending on the amplitude of the Coma magnetic field. A simultaneous fit to the radio, EUV and HXR data is not possible without violating the gamma-ray EGRET upper limit. The best-fit particle physics models yields substantial heating of the intracluster gas, but not sufficient energy injection as to explain the quenching of cooling flows in the innermost region of clusters. Due to the specific multi-frequency features of the DM-induced spectral energy distribution in Coma, we find that supersymmetric models can be significantly and optimally constrained either in the gamma-rays or at radio and microwave frequencies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22f51ea387f39d6406f40dcff2e02678e5d510fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

The Dark Matter Annihilation Signal from Galactic Substructure: Predictions for GLAST (2008, background): “…based on four criteria: (i) a hadronic spectrum from monochromatic quarks, (ii) lack of time variability, (iii) spatial extent, and (iv) a lack of emission at shorter wavelengths, except for very diffuse inverse Compton and synchrotron radiation (Baltz & Wai 2004; Colafrancesco et al. 2006, 2007).”
Galactic Center gamma-ray ``excess'' from an active past of the Galactic Centre? (2014, background): “In the above equation, nISRF represents the density of the Inter Stellar Radiation Field (ISRF), the energy of the ISRF photons and σ is the differential Klein-Nishina cross section (see [23] for more details).”
Numerical simulations of the dark universe: State of the art and the next decade (2012, background): “thus have long been considered good targets for indirect detection searches [93].”
Dark Matter Substructure and Gamma-Ray Annihilation in the Milky Way Halo (2006, background): “Indeed, analytic calculations tend to find larger substructure boost factors (Calcáneo-Roldán&Moore 2000) and a signal that is dominated by small subhalos instead (Colafrancesco et al. 2006).”
Gamma Ray Signals from Dark Matter: Concepts, Status and Prospects (2012, background): “rther increases the sensitivity for DM signals. Galaxy clusters are the most massive DM dominated virialized objects in the Universe and provide excellent targets to search for an annihilation signal [111, 130]. Harboring an enormous hierarchy of substructures, they are the astronomical targets that”
The flattening of the concentration–mass relation towards low halo masses and its implications for the annihilation signal boost (2013, unknown): “1 of Colafrancesco et al. (2006).”
Simulating cosmic rays in clusters of galaxies – II. A unified scheme for radio haloes and relics with predictions of the γ-ray emission (2007, background): “(vii) We furthermore neglected a hypothetical source of secondary electrons that are produced “in-situ” in dark matter(DM) neutralino annihilations (Colafrancesco et al. 2006).”
Bayesian strong gravitational-lens modelling on adaptive grids: objective detection of mass substructure in Galaxies (2008, background): “…its eff cts on stellar streams (e.g., Ibata et al. 2002; Mayer et al. 2002), viaγ-rays from dark matter annihilation (Bergström et al. 1999; Calcáneo-Rold´an & Moore 2000; Stoehr et al. 2003; Colafrancesco et al. 2006) or through gravitational lensing (e.g., Dalal & Kochanek 2002; Koopmans 2005).”
Dark matter and fundamental physics with the Cherenkov Telescope Array (2012, background): “Thus from cosmic DM annihilations, one can expect emission of neutrinos, charged cosmic rays, multi-frequency electromagnetic radiation from charged products, and prompt gamma-rays [25].”
DarkSUSY 6: an advanced tool to compute dark matter properties numerically (2018, methodology): “The method to implement this solution is a slight generalization of the one described [123] and generalizes the one introduced in [124] for a spherically symmetric configuration to an axisymmetric system.”