Dark Matter Substructure and Gamma-Ray Annihilation in the Milky Way Halo

By J. Diemand, Michael Kuhlen, P. Madau. 2006

384 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present initial results from "Via Lactea," the highest resolution simulation to date of Galactic CDM substructure. It follows the formation of a Milky Way-sized halo with Mhalo = 1.8 × 1012 M☉ in a WMAP three-year cosmology, using 234 million particles. Over 10,000 subhalos can be identified at z = 0: their cumulative mass function is well-fit by N(> Msub) = 0.0064 (Msub/Mhalo)-1 down to Msub = 4 × 106 M☉. The total mass fraction in subhalos is 5.3%, while the fraction of surface mass density in substructure within a projected distance of 10 kpc from the halo center is 0.3%. Because of the significant contribution from the smallest resolved subhalos, these fractions have not converged yet. Sub-substructure is apparent in all the larger satellites, and a few dark matter lumps are resolved even in the solar vicinity. The number of dark satellites with peak circular velocities above 10 km s-1 (5 km s-1) is 124 (812): of these, five (26) are found within 0.1rvir, a region that appeared practically smooth in previous simulations. The neutralino self-annihilation γ-ray emission from dark matter clumps is approximately constant per subhalo mass decade. Therefore, while in our run the contribution of substructure to the γ-ray luminosity of the Galactic halo amounts to only 40% of the total spherically averaged smooth signal, we expect this fraction to grow significantly as resolution is increased further. An all-sky map of the expected annihilation γ-ray flux reaching a fiducial observer at 8 kpc from the Galactic center shows that at the current resolution a small number of subhalos start to be bright enough to be visible against the background from the smooth density field surrounding the observer.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d34e79fffa13f2b2c58bba971abccf5cfd51d7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. James S. Bullock
  3. Simon D. M. White
  4. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. Carlos S. Frenk
  8. F. V. D. Bosch

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. James S. Bullock
  2. Volker Springel
  3. L. Strigari
  4. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  5. F. V. D. Bosch
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. Carlos S. Frenk
  8. M. Vogelsberger

Citations in the corpus