The integrated trait–state model

By E. Hamaker, J. Nesselroade, Peter C. M. Molenaar. 2007

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22eabd8815f324236a9b9f23e0da0ddfca1ef2cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. (2008, background): “, all the models that have hitherto been fitted to diagnostic systems data) have no clear implications for intraindividual processes (Borsboom et al., 2003; Hamaker et al., 2007), and it is far from clear whether in the case of psychopathology they have any relevance whatsoever at the level of the i”
Differences in the Between–Person and Within–Person Structures of Affect Are A Matter of Degree (2015, methodology): “…this study uses aggregated states across time for the analyses of BP differences to prevent the BP measure to be confounded with states (see, e.g., Hamaker et al., 2007), the majority of prior findings can mainly serve as proxy (i.e., cross-sectional measures confound states and traits; their…”
Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. (2013, background): “Another option is to look at the entire available time window and define the connections between symptoms not in terms of (lag-1) correlations but rather in terms of the beta coefficients that result from a regression analysis through vector autoregressive modeling (Hamaker et al. 2007).”
Comorbidity: A network perspective (2010, methodology): “If there are individual differences in the precise structure of networks, this may require person-specific network structures to be determined for each individual separately, as is, for instance, possible through the analysis of intra-individual time series (Hamaker et al. 2007; Molenaar 2004).”
A Psychometric Network Perspective on the Validity and Validation of Personality Trait Questionnaires (2019, background): “When aggregated, these states tend to correspond to self-reported traits (Rauthmann, Horstmann, and Sherman, 2019), and when compared across people, these states typically produce the between-person traits (Borkenau and Ostendorf, 1998; Hamaker, Nesselroade, and Molenaar, 2007).”