Validation of Scores on the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding

By Walter L. Leite, S. N. Beretvas. 2005

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22d1d3cdc58f0dfcbd11723ed191d03fcd7616ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Homonegative Microaggressions and Their Impact on LGB Individuals: A Measure Validity Study (2012, unknown): “Although Leite and Beretvas (2005) recommended being cautious when using the MCSDS until its dimensionality is better understood, Tanaka-Matsumi and Kameoka (1986) found that the MCSDS is not significantly related to various measures of anxiety or depression, with correlations ranging from –.19 to…”
Attitudes Toward Muslim Americans Post-9/11 (2013, methodology): “The authors reported obtaining a Kuder- Richardson reliability coefficient of .88 and a testretest correlation of .89 (Leite & Beretvas, 2005).”
The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16) (2015, background): “The issue of dimensionality of SDR is ongoing (Gignac, 2013; Lanyon & Carle, 2007; Leite & Beretvas, 2005).”
Emotional information processing in repressors: The vigilance–avoidance theory (2007, background): “However, most questionnaire studies have suggested that the MCSDS measures an amalgam of self-deception and otherdeception (e.g., Borkenau & Ostendorf, 1992; Leite & Beretvas, 2005; Paulhus, 1984; Paulhus & Reid, 1991).”
Public Stigma of Disordered Gambling: Social Distance, Dangerousness, and Familiarity (2008, methodology): “Impression Management (IM) subscale of the BIDR consists of 20 items designed to assess intentional deception in order to present a socially desirable image ( Leite & Beretvas, 2005 ).”
Dealing with social desirability bias:an application to charitable giving (2011, methodology): “identifying a heterogeneous structure using confirmatory factor analysis, not the unidimensionality assumed by the original authors (see also Leite and Beretvas, 2005”