Paying for water services in Central America: learning from Costa Rica.

By S. Pagiola. 2002

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2271d17583ca3c5cde0d7e86411fb2140a105ea3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. S. Pagiola
2. Sven Wunder
3. A. Arcenas
4. R. Fletcher
5. U. Pascual
6. E. Ramírez
7. José Gobbi
8. G. Platais

Citations in the corpus

• Developing incentives and economic mechanisms for in situ biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes (2007, background): “Under this program only farmers with property rights to land can be paid for the environmental conservation they provide (Pagiola, 2002).”
• Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services in Agricultural Landscapes (2004, background): “Costa Rica has developed an elaborate, nation-wide PES program, the Pago por Servicios Ambientales (PSA) (FONAFIFO, 2000; Pagiola, 2002).”
• Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America (2005, methodology): “Costa Rica s PSA program, for example, mostly involves conserving existing forest (FONAFIFO, 2000; Pagiola, 2002), a much less labor-intensive land use than crop production.”
• Are the poor benefiting from China's land conservation program? (2007, unknown): “Governments in other parts of the world also have begun designing similar programs (Pagiola, 2002; Pagiola and Platais, 2005).”
• Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica (2012, background): “In addition, Pagiola (2008) and Daniels and colleagues (2010) attempt more ambitious meta-analyses of the”
• Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica (2008, background): “Expectations that the PSA program's would improve water services are based on the view, well entrenched in Costa Rica as in most of Central America, that forests are always beneficial to water services (Pagiola, 2002; Kaimowitz, 2000).”