Reporting of statistical inference in the Journal of Applied Psychology : Little evidence of reform.
By S. Finch, Geoff Cumming, N. Thomason. 2001
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22664f1bd3a72dce9a3fd9b09a93e957ef04a703
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Geoff Cumming
- S. Maxwell
- Ke-Hai Yuan
- Charles Lambdin
- Fiona Fidler
- Kristopher J Preacher
- Ralph Hertwig
In Statistics and Probability
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Fiona Fidler
- Geoff Cumming
- S. Maxwell
- Ruth Beyth-Marom
- Charles Lambdin
- Ke-Hai Yuan
- C. Schuster
Citations in the corpus
- STATISTICAL COGNITION: TOWARDS EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN STATISTICS AND STATISTICS EDUCATION (2008, background): “This catalogue (which is descriptive) has been built over many years from teachers’ observations (e.g., Schmidt & Hunter, 1997), surveys of journal reporting practices (e.g., Finch, Cumming, and Thomason, 2001; Fidler et al., 2005) and empirical studies with researchers and students (Haller & Krau”
- Equivalence Tests (2017, unknown): “Finch, Cumming, and Thomason (2001) reported that in the Journal of Applied Psychology , a stable average of around 38 % of articles with nonsignificant results accept the null hypothesis.”
- Significance tests as sorcery: Science is empirical—significance tests are not (2012, background): “(p. 698) Nineteen years later, Finch, Cumming, and Thomason (2001) noted that little had changed in almost two decades.”
- Statistical Rituals: The Replication Delusion and How We Got There (2018, background): “Finch, Cumming, and Thomason (2001) reviewed the articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology over 60 years and concluded that in 38% of these articles, nonsignificance was interpreted as demonstrating that the null hypothesis was true (illusion of certainty).”
- On the Post Hoc Power in Testing Mean Differences (2005, background): “This estimator is called the post hoc power (Gillett, 1994a) or the observed power (Hoenig & Heisey, 2001). The question is how much information the observed power provides us about the power underlying the current study. Hoenig and Heisey (2001) cite 19 journals across a variety of disciplines wher”
- Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? (2015, background): “On a related note, Finch, Cumming, and Thomason (2001) found that 37% of studies with statistically nonsignificant results interpreted their results as providing evidence that the null hypothesis was true.”
- Not Feeling Good in STEM: Effects of Stereotype Activation and Anticipated Affect on Women’s Career Aspirations (2017, background): “Many authors have cautioned that null hypothesis significance tests and p-values contain very little and often misleading information (Anderson et al. 2000; Cohen 1994; Cumming 2014; Finch et al. 2001; Hubbard 1995).”