Increased crop failure due to climate change: assessing adaptation options using models and socio-economic data for wheat in China

By Andrew J. Challinor, E. Simelton, Evan D. G. Fraser, D. Hemming, M. Collins. 2010

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Tools for projecting crop productivity under a range of conditions, and assessing adaptation options, are an important part of the endeavour to prioritize investment in adaptation. We present ensemble projections of crop productivity that account for biophysical processes, inherent uncertainty and adaptation, using spring wheat in Northeast China as a case study. A parallel ‘vulnerability index’ approach uses quantitative socio-economic data to account for autonomous farmer adaptation. The simulations show crop failure rates increasing under climate change, due to increasing extremes of both heat and water stress. Crop failure rates increase with mean temperature, with increases in maximum failure rates being greater than those in median failure rates. The results suggest that significant adaptation is possible through either socio-economic measures such as greater investment, or biophysical measures such as drought or heat tolerance in crops. The results also show that adaptation becomes increasingly necessitated as mean temperature and the associated number of extremes rise. The results, and the limitations of this study, also suggest directions for research for linking climate and crop models, socio-economic analyses and crop variety trial data in order to prioritize options such as capacity building, plant breeding and biotechnology.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/224d86f600fa8382763a738ff7278050e99e537a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. David B. Lobell
  2. Thomas W. Hertel
  3. Marshall Burke
  4. W. Schlenker
  5. Uris Lantz C. Baldos

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

  1. David B. Lobell

In Soil Science

  1. David B. Lobell
  2. Thomas W. Hertel
  3. X. Ju
  4. P. Christie

Citations in the corpus