Keeping up Performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education

By B. Jongbloed, Hans J. J. Vossensteyn. 2001

242 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Education, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/223c04714c1da003b8183931c5febfbc0b38c22a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Jussi Kivistö
2. Henk J. ter Bogt
3. Paul Baines
4. Richard Lynch *
5. Robert W. Scapens

In Education

1. Jussi Kivistö
2. Henk J. ter Bogt
3. Paul Baines
4. Richard Lynch *
5. Robert W. Scapens

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Jussi Kivistö
2. Henk J. ter Bogt
3. Paul Baines
4. Richard Lynch *
5. Robert W. Scapens

Citations in the corpus

• Performance Management in Universities: Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems (2012, methodology): “The external assessment and audit of both teaching and research performance are now common in many countries (see, e.g. Jongbloed and Vossensteyn, 2001; Modell, 2003; Broadbent, 2007; Mazza et al., 2008).”
• An assessment of agency theory as a framework for the government–university relationship (2008, background): “Output indicators derived from research activities can be the number of research publications, research income, the number of patents and licenses received, the number of doctoral students and the number of graduate/doctoral degrees granted (Jongbloed & Vossensteyn, 2001).”
• Strategy development in UK higher education: towards resource‐based competitive advantages (2004, background): “…differentiated position, particularly in an increasingly global marketplace and where the unit of resource is being reduced (Fram & Lau, 1996; Jongbloed & Vossensteyn, 2001; Patterson, 2001; Pidcock, 2001; Harley, 2002; Taylor, 2002; Mazzarol, Soutar & Sim Yaw Seng, 2003; Willmott, 2003).”