Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions

By Sebastian Lotz, T. Okimoto, Thomas Schlösser, Detlef Fetchenhauer. 2011

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21e90a6efba22b1fd79468039dc3e3cfc78b5e93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Seger M. Breugelmans
2. M. Zeelenberg
3. Dominic Abrams
4. Julie Van de Vyver
5. Klaas Sijtsma
6. Rik Pieters

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Seger M. Breugelmans
2. Dominic Abrams
3. M. Zeelenberg
4. J. van Doorn
5. Julie Van de Vyver

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Seger M. Breugelmans
2. M. Zeelenberg
3. Dominic Abrams
4. J. van Doorn
5. Julie Van de Vyver
6. Rik Pieters
7. M. Hogg
8. Klaas Sijtsma

Citations in the corpus

• Testing the prosocial effectiveness of the prototypical moral emotions: Elevation increases benevolent behaviors and outrage increases justice behaviors (2015, methodology): “First, elevation and outrage are both other-oriented emotions which are elicited by events not directly related to the self (Englander, Haidt, & Morris, 2012; Haidt, 2003; Lotz et al., 2011).”
• Anger and Prosocial Behavior (2014, background): “An illustration of this position is the research by Lotz et al. (2011) who manipulated whether or not victims knew that they had been victimized by an unfair allocation.”