The Ensemble Photometric Variability of ~25,000 Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
By D. V. vanden Berk, B. Wilhite, R. Kron, S. Anderson, Robert J. Brunner, P. Hall, Željko Ivezic´, Gordon Richards, D. Schneider, D. York and 4 more. 2003
387 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Using a sample of over 25,000 spectroscopically confirmed quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show how quasar variability in the rest-frame optical/UV regime depends on rest-frame time lag, luminosity, rest wavelength, redshift, the presence of radio and X-ray emission, and the presence of broad absorption line systems. Imaging photometry is compared with three-band spectrophotometry obtained at later epochs spanning time lags up to about 2 yr. The large sample size and wide range of parameter values allow the dependence of variability to be isolated as a function of many independent parameters. The time dependence of variability (the structure function) is well fitted by a single power law with an index γ = 0.246 ± 0.008, on timescales from days to years. There is an anticorrelation of variability amplitude with rest wavelength—e.g., quasars are about twice as variable at 1000 Å as at 6000 Å—and quasars are systematically bluer when brighter at all redshifts. There is a strong anticorrelation of variability with quasar luminosity—variability amplitude decreases by a factor of about 4 when luminosity increases by a factor of 100. There is also a significant positive correlation of variability amplitude with redshift, indicating evolution of the quasar population or the variability mechanism. We parameterize all of these relationships. Quasars with ROSAT All-Sky Survey X-ray detections are significantly more variable (at optical/UV wavelengths) than those without, and radio-loud quasars are marginally more variable than their radio-quiet counterparts. We find no significant difference in the variability of quasars with and without broad absorption line troughs. Currently, no models of quasar variability address more than a few of these relationships. Models involving multiple discrete events or gravitational microlensing are unlikely by themselves to account for the data. So-called accretion disk instability models are promising, but more quantitative predictions are needed.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21db43e70294e9a0b694a6a0534803197f684f9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- D. Schneider
- J. Brinkmann
- L. Hernquist
- P. Hopkins
- Daniel J. Eisenstein
- M. Strauss
- Gordon Richards
- Simon D. M. White
Citations in the corpus
- The Time Delays of Gravitational Lens HE 0435–1223: An Early-Type Galaxy with a Rising Rotation Curve (2005, methodology): “Vanden Berk et al. (2004) have measured the typical quasar structure function in the r band, using a large ensemble of quasar photometry from the SDSS, finding V ð Þ ¼ = 0ð Þ mag2; ð4Þ with 0 ’ 70; 000 days and ’ 1/3.”
- Exploring the Variable Sky with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2007, methodology): “Recently, significant progress in the description of quasar variability has been made by employing the SDSS data (de Vries et al. 2003, 2005; Ivezić et al. 2004b; Vanden Berk et al. 2004; Sesar et al. 2006).”
- LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2008, background): “39 Tyson, J. A., and LSST collaboration, 2008b, see http://universe.ucdavis.edu/docs/LSST petascale challenge.pdf Vanden Berk, D.E., Richards, G.T., Bauer, A., et al. 2001, Astronomical Journal, 122, 549 Vanden Berk, D.E., Wilhite, B.C., Kron, R.G., et al. 2004, Astrophysical Journal, 601, 692 Walke”
- The Sloan Digital Sky Survey View of the Palomar-Green Bright Quasar Survey (2005, background): “…photoelectric photometry of nonvariable stars, not of any BQS objects; however, any color variability over the epoch difference between PG and SDSS will be negligible compared to the PG photographic color error (Vanden Berk et al. 2004), so the color comparison is not affected by variability.”
- What the Optical Recombination Lines Can Tell Us about the Broad-Line Regions of Active Galactic Nuclei (2004, background): “This effect has also been found in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasar sample (Vanden Berk et al. 2004).”
- ARE THE VARIATIONS IN QUASAR OPTICAL FLUX DRIVEN BY THERMAL FLUCTUATIONS? (2009, background): “This correlation is most likely a reflection of the well-known fact that quasar emission at shorter wavelengths is more variable (e.g., Vanden Berk et al. 2004) 4.2.”
- Reverberation Mapping of High-Luminosity Quasars: First Results (2006, background): “SPIE, 3352, 34 Reichert, G. A., et al. 1994, ApJ, 425, 582 Reimers, D., Hagen, H.-J., Schramm, J., Kriss, G. A., & Shull, J. M. 2005, A&A, 436, 465 Riess, A. G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 607, 665 Rodriguez-Pascual, P. M., et al. 1997, ApJS, 110, 9 Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, ”
- QUANTIFYING QUASAR VARIABILITY AS PART OF A GENERAL APPROACH TO CLASSIFYING CONTINUOUSLY VARYING SOURCES (2009, background): “…and the variability parameters have redshift corrections (τrest = τ/(1 + z) and σ̂rest = σ̂ (1 + z)1/2; Kelly et al. 2009) and potentially K-corrections for any scalings of the parameters with wavelength, such as those seen in average structure functions (e.g., Vanden Berk et al. 2004).”
- MODELING THE TIME VARIABILITY OF SDSS STRIPE 82 QUASARS AS A DAMPED RANDOM WALK (2010, methodology): “…variable (∼90% at the 0.03 mag rms level; Sesar et al. 2007), and the variations in brightness are aperiodic and on the order of 20% on time scales QLD 4811, Australia 8University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 of months to years (e.g., Hook et al. 1994; Vanden Berk et al. 2004).”
- A systematic search for changing-look quasars in SDSS (2015, background): “(SDSS; e.g., Vanden Berk et al. 2004; Wilhite et al. 2005; Sesar et al. 2007; Schmidt et al. 2010; Butler & Bloom 2011; MacLeod et al. 2012) and more recently Pan-STARRS1 (PS1; Morganson et al. 2014, 2015; Simm et al. 2015).”
- THE POPULATION OF VISCOSITY- AND GRAVITATIONAL WAVE-DRIVEN SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE BINARIES AMONG LUMINOUS ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI (2009, background): “Very large area variability surveys, such as in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), are shallow, and detect variability down to only i ≈ 20 mag (Vanden Berk et al. 2004).”
- Testing thermal reprocessing in active galactic nuclei accretion discs (2007, background): “From studies of 25,000 quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Vanden Berk et al. (2004) also find a positive correlation of variability amplitude with redshift.”
- THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY REVERBERATION MAPPING PROJECT: TECHNICAL OVERVIEW (2014, background): “One possibility is to use spectral decomposition (e.g., Vanden Berk et al. 2006) to separate the host and AGN continuum at 5100 Å, or to use a shorter wavelength to measure the AGN continuum (where the host contamination is less important).”
- EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6 (2004, background): “We expect roughly 5% additional incompleteness as a result of our filtering of objects via their photometric flags (e.g., those with ‘‘fatal’’ errors); see Vanden Berk et al. (2004) for further discussion of the completeness of the SDSS quasar survey.”
- THE SDSS-IV EXTENDED BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY: QUASAR TARGET SELECTION (2015, background): “Many high-impact projects that used the original SDSS-I /II quasar samples can therefore potentially be revisited using much larger samples with eBOSS, such as composite quasar spectra, rare types of quasars, and precision studies of the quasar luminosity function (e.g. Vanden Berk et al. 2001; Inad”
- A DESCRIPTION OF QUASAR VARIABILITY MEASURED USING REPEATED SDSS AND POSS IMAGING (2011, background): “…on tens of thousands of objects and several hundred thousand photometric observations, as well as explorations of the long-term variability (Vanden Berk et al. 2004, hereafter VB04; Ivezić et al. 2004c, hereafter I04; Wilhite et al. 2005; Mahabal et al. 2005; De Vries, Becker, White, & Loomis…”
- Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name? (2017, background): “Variability selection may not help all that much for such sources considering that, while the amplitude of variability increases at lower luminosity (Vanden Berk et al. 2004, see also Sect.”