EFFICIENT PHOTOMETRIC SELECTION OF QUASARS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. ∼1, 000, 000 QUASARS FROM DATA RELEASE 6

By Gordon Richards, Robert Nichol, Alexander G. Gray, Robert J. Brunner, Robert Lupton, D. V. vanden Berk, S. Chong, M. Weinstein, D. Schneider, S. Anderson and 8 more. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2004

389 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a catalog of 1,172,157 quasar candidates selected from the photometric imaging data of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The objects are all point sources to a limiting magnitude of i = 21.3 from 8417 deg2 of imaging from SDSS Data Release 6 (DR6). This sample extends our previous catalog by using the latest SDSS public release data and probing both ultraviolet (UV)-excess and high-redshift quasars. While the addition of high-redshift candidates reduces the overall efficiency (quasars:quasar candidates) of the catalog to ∼80%, it is expected to contain no fewer than 850,000 bona fide quasars, which is ∼8 times the number of our previous sample and ∼10 times the size of the largest spectroscopic quasar catalog. Cross-matching between our photometric catalog and spectroscopic quasar catalogs from both the SDSS and 2dF survey yields 88,879 spectroscopically confirmed quasars. For judicious selection of the most robust UV-excess sources (∼500, 000 objects in all), the efficiency is nearly 97%—more than sufficient for detailed statistical analyses. The catalog's completeness to type 1 (broad-line) quasars is expected to be no worse than 70%, with most missing objects occurring at z < 0.7 and 2.5 < z < 3.0. In addition to classification information, we provide photometric redshift estimates (typically good to Δz ± 0.3 [2σ]) and cross-matching with radio, X-ray, and proper-motion catalogs. Finally, we consider the catalog's utility for determining the optical luminosity function of quasars and are able to confirm the flattening of the bright-end slope of the quasar luminosity function at z ∼ 4 as compared to z ∼ 2.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0c417987365bc5c1ccdd34c55cea2881ad5f685

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. J. Brinkmann
  3. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. M. Blanton
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. D. Weinberg
  8. M. Strauss

In Ecology

  1. M. Blanton
  2. F. V. D. Bosch
  3. H. Mo
  4. Xiaohu Yang
  5. J. Brinkmann
  6. D. Schneider
  7. Robert Nichol
  8. Will J. Percival

Citations in the corpus