Atmospheric Response Patterns Associated with Tropical Forcing
By M. Hoerling, Arun Kumar. 2002
222 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/216b9afa9f52218648ae286e67bc94119d23fad8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Linear Interference in the Annular Mode Response to Tropical SST Forcing (2010, background): “Several previous studies have highlighted the need to use multimodel ensembles in order to obtain robust teleconnection signals (e.g., Hoerling and Kumar 2002, 2004; Annamalai et al. 2007).”
- An analysis of multimodel ensemble predictions for seasonal climate anomalies (2002, background): “For the case of seasonal predictions this colinearity is manifested because of the fact that on large spatial scales the atmospheric response to anomalous SSTs in different AGCMs tends to be similar [e.g., see Hoerling and Kumar, 2002].”
- Observed Associations Among Storm Tracks, Jet Streams and Midlatitude Oceanic Fronts (2013, background): “The importance has been emphasized in the notion of the “atmospheric bridge”, through which the effect of tropical Pacific SST anomalies (SSTAs), associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO), is transferred into midlatitudes to drive SSTAs remotely with the opposite sign [Lau and Nath, 19”
- Tropical Pacific and Atlantic Climate Variability in CCSM3 (2006, background): “…with ENSO is a deepening and eastward extension of the wintertime Aleutian Low Pressure Cell over the North Pacific during warm events compared to cold events (Horel and Wallace, 1981; Trenberth, 1991; Trenberth et al., 1998; Hoerling and Kumar, 2002; Alexander et al., 2002; among others).”
- ENSO simulation in coupled ocean-atmosphere models: are the current models better? (2006, methodology): “Hoerling and Kumar (2002) performed sensitivity experiments using an atmospheric GCM in which idealized warm SST anomalies were prescribed at different locations in the tropical Pacific.”
- Predictions of Nino3.4 SST in CFSv1 and CFSv2: a diagnostic comparison (2013, background): “A change in tropical Pacific SST behavior around 1999, if real, would be important because of the implied ENSO state, with its known remote teleconnections to seasonal climate (Hoerling and Kumar 2002; among many others).”
- Northern Winter Stationary Waves: Theory and Modeling (2002, background): “…(1982) and Branstator (1985), and continuing work has been motivated by GCM studies, which often show that the extratropical wave train forced by SST anomalies is roughly fixed in longitude, independent of the longitude of the SST anomaly (see Hoerling and Kumar 2002, this issue, for an update).”
- ENSO regulation of MJO teleconnection (2011, background): “convection can induce a large difference over the extratropical flow (Branstator 2003) and the notion that the Pacific-North American sector is sensitive to the tropical Pacific SST (Hoering and Kumar 2002; Mori and Watanabe 2008).”
- The Remarkably Strong Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex of Winter 2020: Links to Record‐Breaking Arctic Oscillation and Ozone Loss (2020, background): “…the Indian Ocean have also been shown to encourage a strengthened Arctic polar vortex and positive NAM in the troposphere (Fletcher & Kushner, 2011; Hoerling & Kumar, 2002; Hoerling et al., 2004; Li et al., 2010), particularly in isolation from impacts by the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)…”