Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations.
By P. McGrath, G. Walco, D. Turk, R. Dworkin, Mark T. Brown, Karina W. Davidson, C. Eccleston, G. Finley, K. Goldschneider, L. Haverkos and 16 more. Journal of Pain, 2008
822 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/214b8435e30038952bb7798a300e690be6317105
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Fisher
- L. Heathcote
- T. Palermo
- A. C. de C Williams
- Jennifer Lau
- J. Stinson
- T. Kavanagh
- J. Yamada
Citations in the corpus
- Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self‐report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents (2006, methodology): “Furthermore, dimensions of pain relief, temporal aspects of pain and pain interference with aspects of emotional, social and physical function were not covered in this review as they were addressed by the larger Ped-IMMPACT group (McGrath et al., 2005).”
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological therapies for children with chronic pain. (2014, methodology): “However, these earlier reviews were undertaken without any methodological concern for bias and included trials conducted before consensus statements on methodological quality were reported (McGrath et al., 2008).”