Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self‐report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents

By J. Stinson, T. Kavanagh, J. Yamada, Navreet Gill, B. Stevens. Pain, 2006

792 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aee7a998e87961f952722a475769f3f8e6a4a93a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

1. José Pais-Ribeiro

Citations in the corpus

• Systematic review of observational (behavioral) measures of pain for children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years (2007, background): “A separate review was commissioned for self-report scales (Stinson et al., 2006).”
• Validity of four pain intensity rating scales (2011, methodology): “After the 20-second cold immersion, when we anticipated that pain would be at its most intense, we administered paper-andpencil versions of the 4 pain measures (VAS, NRS, VRS, and FPSR).”