The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

By Laura Busse, Kenneth C. Roberts, R. Crist, D. Weissman, Marty G. Woldorff. 2005

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “…head at this point is that the very definition of a multisensory object is itself problematic (Spence et al., 2014), with some researchers (e.g., Busse et al., 2005; Turatto et al., 2005) seemingly being more Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 15 March 2017 | Volume 8 | Article…”
The Curious Incident of Attention in Multisensory Integration: Bottom-up vs. Top-down (2016, unknown): “Attending to an object feature in one modality can direct attention to another modality (Busse et al., 2005; Molholm et al., 2007) and the attentional focus of subjects affects the unisensory weights and extent of integration with, e.”
Sound-Induced Enhancement of Low-Intensity Vision: Multisensory Influences on Human Sensory-Specific Cortices and Thalamic Bodies Relate to Perceptual Enhancement of Visual Detection Sensitivity (2010, background): “Our cross-modal findings arose even though only the visual modality had to be judged here (cf. McDonald et al., 2000; Busse et al., 2005; Stormer et al., 2009).”
Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites (2009, methodology): “Furthermore, previous studies demonstrating attentional modulation of MI used electroencephalography (Talsma et al., 2007) that has a relatively low spatial resolution and is likely to miss any effect in subcortical regions [but see Busse et al., 2005 using functional magnetic resonance imaging (f”
Multisensory Interplay Reveals Crossmodal Influences on ‘Sensory-Specific’ Brain Regions, Neural Responses, and Judgments (2008, unknown): “Unlike those studies (such as Kennett et al., 2001; McDonald et al., 2003) that presented a ''cue'' event in one modality prior to a ''target'' event in another sense, Busse et al. (2005) studied effects of task-irrelevant auditory costimulation on a visual spatial attention task.”
Distinct Functional Contributions of Primary Sensory and Association Areas to Audiovisual Integration in Object Categorization (2010, background): “, due to spatial attention (Busse et al., 2005; Fairhall and Macaluso, 2009), the superadditive interactions in primary auditory cortex were observed equally for both, explicit categorization and passive exposure.”
Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron (2008, unknown): “This suggests that top-down influences could affect relatively early sensory encoding, which in turn could underlie a host of well-documented multisensory attentional effect”
Dual mechanisms for the cross-sensory spread of attention: how much do learned associations matter? (2010, background): “…from an attended visual stimulus to a simultaneously presented task-irrelevant sound, whether through the stimulus-driven or representation-driven processes, had previously been shown to onset anywhere from 180 to 250 ms poststimulus (Busse et al. 2005; Molholm et al. 2007; Talsma et al. 2007).”
A taxonomy of external and internal attention. (2011, unknown): “Attention serves to bind simultaneously presented signals across space into multisensory objects (Busse et al. 2005).”
Selective attention and audiovisual integration: is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? (2006, unknown): “Integration: Is Attending to Both”