Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron
By Barry E. Stein, Terrence R. Stanford. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2008
1,521 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Sensory Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff8a6a886557d283291063bfb85ac95fca023ea4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Micah M. Murray
- Charles Spence
- Uta Noppeney
- Mark T. Wallace
- Antonia Thelen
- Vincenzo Romei
- Christoph Kayser
- Gregor Thut
In Nutrition and Dietetics
- Charles Spence
- H. Ehrsson
- Christoph Kayser
- Andreas Kalckert
- Stephanie Gleiss
- Brigitte Röder
- Dora E. Angelaki
- Gregory C. DeAngelis
In Sensory Systems
- Micah M. Murray
- Charles Spence
- Uta Noppeney
- Mark T. Wallace
- Antonia Thelen
- Christoph Kayser
- Vincenzo Romei
- Stephanie Gleiss
Citations in the corpus
- The Curious Incident of Attention in Multisensory Integration: Bottom-up vs. Top-down (2016, positive): “Studies using simple, abstract stimuli have predominantly focused on determining stimulus-driven effects, such as their relative timing or location (Noesselt et al., 2010; Stein and Stanford, 2008; Van Wassenhove et al., 2007) or their relative intensity (Holmes, 2009; Rach et al.”
- Modeling development of natural multi-sensory integration using neural self-organisation and probabilistic population codes (2015, background): “Topographic mapping is a pervasive principle in sensory processing (Imai, Sakano, & Vosshall, 2010; Kaas, 1997; King, 2013; Stein & Stanford, 2008; Yang & Shadlen, 2007).”
- Distinct Functional Contributions of Primary Sensory and Association Areas to Audiovisual Integration in Object Categorization (2010, background): “in a similar manner as the known improvements in orientation behavior are driven by superadditive interactions in the superior colliculus (Stein and Stanford, 2008).”
- Identifying and Quantifying Multisensory Integration: A Tutorial Review (2014, background): “…1988; Kinsella et al. 1989; Wilkinson et al. 1996; Jiang et al. 2002; Burnett et al. 2004; Calvert et al. 2004; Stanford and Stein 2007; Driver and Noesselt 2008; Stein and Stanford 2008; Sarko et al. 2012; Van Wanrooij et al. 2009; Corneil et al. 2002; Bell et al. 2005; Frens and Van Opstal 1998).”
- Spatiotemporal architecture of cortical receptive fields and its impact on multisensory interactions (2009, neutral): “work describing the neural consequences of multisensory convergence have come from the brainstem (Stein and Meredith 1993; Stein and Stanford 2008), studies are increasingly focusing on multisensory domains within the”
- Sensory Processing in Autism: A Review of Neurophysiologic Findings (2011, neutral): “However, others propose that as sensory integration is dependent on the rapid exchange of information between distinct cortical and subcortical regions, disruptions in connectivity likely play the causative role (68).”
- Selective integration of auditory-visual looming cues by humans. (2009, positive): “Multisensory interactions are a fundamental feature of brain organization (Calvert, Spence, & Stein, 2004; Ghazanfar & Schroeder, 2006; Stein & Meredith, 1993; Stein & Stanford, 2008).”
- Explicit encoding of multimodal percepts by single neurons in the human brain. (2009, neutral): “How the brain integrates information from different sensory modalities has been a topic of extensive research, for example, for the study of orienting behavior—that is, localizing an event perceived by more than one sense (for a recent review see [13])—or the congruence between sight and sound infor”
- A Normalization Model of Multisensory Integration (2011, positive): “…each combination of dominance weights were simulated, for a total population of 45 neurons (similar to that recorded by Alvarado et al. 26 ), Responses were computed for five stimulus intensities (4, 16, 64, 256, and 1024), Poisson noise was added, and 8 repetitions of each stimulus were simulated.”
- Magnetic alignment in mammals and other animals (2013, background): “Integration of spatiotemporally coincident crossmodal stimuli results in enhancing and speeding up of responses to various stimuli (Stein and Stanford, 2008).”
- Moving a Rubber Hand that Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency (2012, positive): “, 2008; Ehrsson, 2012) or so-called “multisensory integration” (Holmes and Spence, 2005; Stein and Stanford, 2008).”