Plant Turnover and Productivity Growth in Canadian Manufacturing

By John R. Baldwin, Wulong Gu. 2006

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2127daee6f6540acae43a9c450ffe15fe2e5c514

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes (2009, background): “…decreasing shares of output in low-productivity ones are very important drivers in the growth of sectoral productivities, even if the process of displacement of lower efficiency plants is rather slow (cf. the evidence discussed in Ahn, 2001; Baily et al., 1992; Baldwin, 1995; Baldwin and Gu, 2006).”
Setting It Right: Employment Protection, Labour Reallocation and Productivity (2011, background): “…decompositions to show that jobs are reallocated from firms with below-average labour productivity to firms with above-average labour productivity (see e.g. Olley and Pakes 1996; Griliches and Regev 1995; Foster et al. 2001; Disney et al. 2003; Baldwin and Gu 2006; Bartelsman et al. 2009).”
Creative destruction and regional productivity growth: evidence from the Dutch manufacturing and services industries (2008, background): “In recent decades, productivity growth in manufacturing has increasingly been driven by the incumbents (through industry restructuring, de-industrialisation), while the contribution made by new entrants (and exits) has declined over time (see Baldwin and Gu 2006 ).”
Corporate performances and market selection. Some comparative evidence (2010, background): “So, for example, Baldwin and Gu (2006) find, too, a negative between term in most sectors, when using the Griliches and Regev (1995) decomposition formula.”
Measuring and Analyzing Cross-country Differences in Firm Dynamics (2009, background): “Baldwin and Gu (2003) motivate their approach as being more appropriate to the extent that entrants are displacing exiting plants, so the correct reference group for entrants are the exiting businesses they are displacing.”