Non-canonical agreement is canonical

73 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits (2015, methodology): “This approach has been worked out for syntax, specifically for the tricky area of agreement by Comrie 2003, Corbett 2003, Evans 2003, Polinsky 2003, and is applied to Miraña in Seifart 2005:156–74 and to Gujarati in Suthar 2006:178–98; the analysis of agreement is taken further in Corbett 2006,…”
Canonical derivational morphology (2010, background): “In syntax, agreement has occupied centre stage, for instance in Corbett (2003) (2006), Comrie (2003), Evans (2003), Polinsky (2003), Seifart (2005: 156-174) and Suthar (2006: 178-98).”
On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory (2007, background): “43 Polinsky (2003) (see also Dahlstrom 1995) proposes a prolepsis analysis for the Blackfoot construction under consideration on which the matrix verb agrees with a null object.”
Morphological and Abstract Case (2008, background): “49 The data discussed in Bobaljik 2006 regarding domains involve long-distance agreement; for details, see Polinsky and Potsdam 2001 and Polinsky 2003 (for Tsez), Branigan and MacKenzie 2002 (for Innu-aimûn), Bhatt 2005 (for Hindi).”
Number Long Distance Agreement in (Substandard) Basque (2006, unknown): “See Polinsky (2003) for a recent typology of LDA phenomena.”