CONDITION‐SPECIFIC COMPETITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ALTITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION OF STREAM FISHES

By Y. Taniguchi, S. Nakano. 2000

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/209bb24d4917978a92c1d3e36821899959b33359

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Rosenfeld
2. M. Young
3. J. B. Dunham
4. G. Grenouillet
5. B. Rieman
6. T. McMahon
7. A. Zale
8. S. Brosse

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Rosenfeld
2. T. McMahon
3. A. Zale
4. M. Young
5. J. B. Dunham
6. B. Jonsson
7. G. Grenouillet
8. B. Rieman

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the distribution of trout and salmon along a longitudinal stream gradient (2005, background): “For example, Taniguchi & Nakano (2000) provide clear evidence for the role of condition-specific asymmetric competition in determining the distribution of two species of char along a temperature gradient.”
• An experimental evaluation of competitive and thermal effects on brown trout (Salmo trutta) and Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii utah) performance along an altitudinal gradient (2005, background): “Specifically, downstream species may be unable to avoid starvation (Taniguchi et al. 1998; Taniguchi and Nakano 2000 ) and (or) complete their entire life cycle (e.g., embryonic phases; De Staso and Rahel 1994; Novinger 2000) under cold conditions, even if juveniles or adults experience positive gr”
• Causes of warm‐edge range limits: systematic review, proximate factors and implications for climate change (2014, background): “…biotic factors may reflect range limits set by biotic factors that change along an abiotic gradient (e.g. change in competition with temperature; Taniguchi & Nakano, 2000; Cunningham et al., 2009), but it is unclear in most of these cases which factor (abiotic or biotic, or their interaction)…”
• Comparative Thermal Requirements of Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Rainbow Trout: Implications for Species Interactions and Development of Thermal Protection Standards (2007, background): “High temperature in lower elevations can cause direct mortality of salmonids that are more adapted to cold water, whereas sublethal temperature increases can alter metabolism, growth, and competitive interactions that may favor more warmwater-adapted salmonids (Taniguchi et al. 1998; Taniguchi and ”
• Competitive exclusion along climate gradients: energy efficiency influences the distribution of two salmonid fishes (2011, background): “Species pairs of northern freshwater fishes are classical model organisms for studying competitive interactions (Taniguchi & Nakano, 2000; Jonsson et al., 2008) because they live in relatively simple ecosystems with short food chains and low species diversity.”
• Competitive interactions between native and exotic salmonids: a combined field and laboratory demonstration (2007, background): “Although the competition strength may be shaped by environmental factors (Taniguchi & Nakano 2000; Fausch et al. 2001), we hypothesise that, on a longer time scale, brown trout may competitively exclude the remaining brook trout, or at least drastically reduce brook trout abundance, as frequently…”
• Alien invasions in aquatic ecosystems: Toward an understanding of brook trout invasions and potential impacts on inland cutthroat trout in western North America (2002, unknown): “A similar example was documented for segregation between Dolly Varden charr (Salvelinus malma) and white-spotted charr (S. leucomaenis; Taniguchi and Nakano, 2000).”
• Strategies for conserving native salmonid populations at risk from nonnative fish invasions: tradeoffs in using barriers to upstream movement (2006, background): “An exception is experiments designed to explicitly consider environmental factors like temperature across a range of natural conditions, either in the field (McHugh and Budy 2005) or by simulating conditions in the laboratory (Taniguchi and Nakano 2000).”
• Assessing the Habitat Requirements of Stream Fishes: An Overview and Evaluation of Different Approaches (2003, background): “Physical habitat requirements may be strongly modified by biotic factors—for instance, system productivity, the requirement for refuges in the presence of predators ( Chapman et al. 1996 ), or narrower thermal tolerances in the presence of competitors ( Taniguchi and Nakano 2000 ).”
• ROLE OF ABIOTIC FACTORS IN GOVERNING SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INVASION: A TEST WITH ARGENTINE ANTS (2002, background): “Despite the history of interest on this topic, there remain relatively few experimental studies on animals that have documented the mechanisms underlying condition-specific competition (Kingsolver 1989, Dunson and Travis 1991, Warner et al. 1993, Taniguchi and Nakano 2000).”
• Potential impacts of global climate change on freshwater fisheries (2007, background): “1995; Myrick and Cech 2000, 2003), there are limits to the magnitude and rate of thermal acclimation (Taniguchi and Nakano 2000).”
• Evolution and Ecology of Species Range Limits (2009, background): “Condition-specific competition, wherein the relative competitive abilities of species depend on the abiotic environment, is one mechanism by which the interaction between biotic and abiotic variables may determine distributions along environmental gradients (Taniguchi & Nakano 2000).”
• Linking Scales in Stream Ecology (2006, background): “In laboratory experiments, Taniguchi and Nakano (2000) found evidence for temperature-mediated competition, with S. leucomaenis aggressively dominating S. malma at higher temperatures typical of downstream reaches, but S. malma growing more rapidly at lower temperatures typical of upstream reaches.”
• Biotic interactions in freshwater benthic habitats (2010, background): “For example, water temperature can determine competitive superiority and, hence, altitudinal separations of stream char by affecting individual aggressiveness, food intake, and growth (Taniguchi and Nakano 2000).”
• Temperature and Competition between Bull Trout and Brook Trout: A Test of the Elevation Refuge Hypothesis (2007, background): “Both species survived temperatures of 88C and 128C at high rates (.85%) over the 60-d test period, in contrast to the marked differences observed in other species pairs, where the high-elevation species had a distinct survival advantage over the low-elevation species at colder temperatures ( Taniguc”