Participant Self-Selection Biases as a Function of Individual Differences in Time Perspective

By K. Harber, P. Zimbardo, J. Boyd. 2003

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2065eb6ca3030691fec2f418ebca32154a66dadf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Tom Bowerman
2. Jia Wei Zhang
3. Ryan T. Howell
4. Fi Sutherland
5. Colette Henry
6. Lisa Drake
7. Melissa G. Keith
8. P. D. Harms

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Tom Bowerman
2. Ryan T. Howell
3. Jia Wei Zhang
4. Melissa G. Keith
5. P. D. Harms
6. Louis Tay
7. M. Stolarski

In Social Psychology

1. Tom Bowerman
2. Ryan T. Howell
3. Jia Wei Zhang
4. Fi Sutherland
5. Colette Henry
6. Lisa Drake
7. Melissa G. Keith
8. P. D. Harms

Citations in the corpus

• Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (2013, result): “Similar to these studies, more researchers have used three time perspective or fewer in their research (Epel et al., 1999; Harber et al., 2003; Luyckx et al., 2010).”
• Time Perspective and Correlates of Wellbeing (2008, background): “This can, in itself, perpetuate more positive functioning and can lead to higher levels of academic achievement (Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999), elevated levels of participation in research studies (Harber et al., 2003), success in prison training programmes (Chubick et al.”
• Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations (2017, background): “Like other convenience samples ( Harber et al., 2003), self-selection will likely play a role in the final sample.”