Environmentalism, democracy, and pollution control

By Per G. Fredriksson, Eric Neumayer, R. Damania, S. Gates. 2005

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/202dbda0d4917fba43ef0918ef190d8c0ae8f528

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Per G. Fredriksson
2. Jim R. Wollscheid
3. Alexandra Leitão
4. Seth Binder
5. Hugh Ward
6. Sam Fankhauser
7. C. Gennaioli
8. M. Collins

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Hugh Ward
2. Sam Fankhauser
3. C. Gennaioli
4. M. Collins
5. Paula Castro
6. Alexandra Leitão
7. Martin Stadelmann
8. Eric Neumayer

In Strategy and Management

1. Alexandra Leitão
2. Paula Castro
3. Martin Stadelmann
4. Eric Neumayer
5. Per G. Fredriksson
6. Thomas Plümper
7. Richard Perkins
8. Yoram Z. Haftel

Citations in the corpus

• The political economy of passing climate change legislation: Evidence from a survey (2015, background): “Lachapelle and Paterson (2013), Bernauer and Koubi (2009) and Fredriksson et al. (2005) test these theories empirically.”
• Corruption and the environmental Kuznets Curve: Empirical evidence for sulfur (2010, background): “The environmental consequences of government corruption have been analyzed in the literature by Damania, Fredriksson and List [12], Fredriksson and Svensson [18], Fredriksson, Neumayer, Damania and Gates [19] and Wilson and Damania [48].”
• Climate policy innovation in the South – Domestic and international determinants of renewable energy policies in developing and emerging countries (2014, background): “The strength of environmental groups has been positively linked with more or stronger environmental policy, including policies that support the deployment of RE energy (Fredriksson et al., 2005; Vachon and Menz, 2006).”
• Democratic institutions versus autocratic regimes: The case of environmental policy (2007, background): “Fredriksson et al. (2005) study the interaction effect of political competition and political participation on lead content in gasoline.”
• Environmental pressure group strength and air pollution: An empirical analysis (2004, background): “Only one study currently links the EKC and ENGO literature (Damania et al., 2005).”
• Liberal democracy and sustainability (2008, background): “Fredriksson et al. (2005) find that national limits on the lead content of petrol go down with the number of environmental pressure groups and with the degree of political competition, so long as political participation is high enough.”