Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques
By Ian J. Bateman, Richard T. Carson, Brett Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, Tannis Hett, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes. 2002
861 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fc85f9fcd8cba457542cd8548d2e762e3c80a21
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Riccardo Scarpa
- N. Hanley
- W. Hutchinson
- S. Mourato
- G. Atkinson
- Katrin Rehdanz
- Jette Bredahl Jacobsen
- David J. Maddison
Citations in the corpus
- On the Use of Subjective Well-Being Data for Environmental Valuation (2010, background): “They rely on asking people hypothetical questions to compute their willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in environmental quality or their willingness to accept payment in exchange for bearing a particular loss (for reviews on this see Hanley et al., 2001; Bateman et al., 2002).”
- Information and Willingness to Pay in a Contingent Valuation Study: The Value of S. Erasmo in the Lagoon of Venice (2004, background): “Many researchers (see, for example, Carson et al., 2001; Bateman et al., 2002) consider it a good CV practice to remind respondents succinctly of possible reasons for voting in favor or against the hypothetical public program before asking the referendum question, even though the NOAA Panel did not ”
- Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in Germany (2008, methodology): “The contingent valuation method is often criticized because of the difficulties related to the construction of a market and its numerous potential biases (see Mitchell and Carson, 1989 or Bateman et al., 2002, for a more recent overview of the method).”
- Are We Willing to Pay Enough to `Back the Bid'?: Valuing the Intangible Impacts of London's Bid to Host the 2012 Summer Olympic Games (2008, methodology): “In our choice of predictors of WTP, we followed the recommendations of the Bateman et al. (2002) stated preference manual, which are common practice in modern applications of CV.”
- Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach (2017, background): “, 2012a); and (iii) monetary techniques for estimating economic values for services, such as stated preference methods (Bateman et al., 2002) using contingent valuation (e.”
- Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation? (2009, background): “In a sense, this result is surprising, since on the whole CV practitioners have advised against the use of donation-based designs, except where provision point mechanisms are used (Bateman et al. 2002; Rondeau et al. 1999).”
- Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey (2010, positive): “The value elicitation format is a dichotomous choice with a follow-up question, leading to a double-bounded model, which improves efficiency (Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen 1991; Alberini 1995; Scarpa and Bateman 2000) over the single-bounded format (Bateman et al. 2002) while it is expected to prod”
- Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness (2008, methodology): “Although a wide variety of elicitation techniques are available [4, 42], the NOAA panel recommended the use of a ‘one-shot’ or single-bound (SB) dichotomous choice referendum style question.”