Challenges and Potential Solutions – Individualised Antibiotic Dosing at the Bedside for Critically Ill Patients: a structured review

By J. Roberts, M. Abdul-Aziz, J. Lipman, J. Mouton, A. Vinks, T. Felton, W. Hope, A. Farkas, M. Neely, Jerome J. Schentag and 4 more. Lancet. Infectious Diseases (Print), 2014

862 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Summary Infections in critically ill patients are associated with persistently poor clinical outcomes. These patients have severely altered and variable antibiotic pharmacokinetics and are infected by less susceptible pathogens. Antibiotic dosing that does not account for these features is likely to result in sub-optimal outcomes. In this paper, we review the patient- and pathogen-related challenges that contribute to inadequate antibiotic dosing and discuss how a process for individualised antibiotic therapy, that increases the accuracy of dosing, can be implemented to further optimise care for the critically ill patient. The process for optimised antibiotic dosing firstly requires determination of the physiological derangements in the patient that can alter antibiotic concentrations including altered fluid status, microvascular failure, serum albumin concentrations as well as altered renal and hepatic function. Secondly, knowledge of the susceptibility of the infecting pathogen should be determined through liaison with the microbiology laboratory. The patient and pathogen challenges can then be solved by combining susceptibility data with measured antibiotic concentration data (where possible) into a clinical dosing software. Such software uses pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models from critically ill patients to accurately predict the dosing requirements for the individual patient with the aim of optimising antibiotic exposure and maximising effectiveness.

Subfields: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Epidemiology, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1faa1a9509b3d1c50e7dadd671ecbc113e0c0029

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

  1. L. Poirel
  2. P. Nordmann

In Epidemiology

  1. A. Rhodes
  2. Laura Evans
  3. Janice L. Zimmerman
  4. Mitchell M. Levy
  5. R. Dellinger
  6. Mervyn Singer
  7. Djillali Annane
  8. P. Nordmann

In Pharmacology

  1. P. Nordmann
  2. L. Poirel

Citations in the corpus