The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross‐National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap

By Torben Iversen, F. Rosenbluth. 2006

407 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f9f76fdc3260c36a2cd55ec68b26a935ac6c0a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics (2018, positive): “Voter expectations of stereotypical family roles put female candidates at a serious disadvantage given the longer hours that women spend on family work than men (Bianchi 2006; Lawless and Fox 2004; Iversen and Rosenbluth 2006).”
Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Development (2009, positive): “Source: Data were taken from Iversen and Rosenbluth (2006), figure 4: 29.”
Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation (2008, background): “The growth of women’s labor force participation, rising divorce rates, and political mobilization in turn stimulated demands by women for financial independence and the expansion of day care and other social services (Iversen & Rosenbluth, 2006).”
The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution (2011, background): “Following Iversen and Rosenbluth (2006), among others, we expect female labor force participation to be associated with more political support for redistributive social policies.”
Growth and Persistence of the Radical Right in Postindustrial Democracies: Advances and Challenges in Comparative Research (2007, background): “Women, by contrast, as primary caregivers to most children and the elderly, as well as intermittent labour market participants with weaker and less specific skills, back the welfare state (Iversen and Rosenbluth 2006 ) and therefore are more wary of radical right-wing parties.”
A Social Role Theory Perspective on Gender Gaps in Political Attitudes (2010, background): “Examples of such integrative studies are analyses of how gender differences in attitudes contribute to the gender gap in party identification and, subsequently, vote choice (Kaufmann & Petrocik, 1999) or how the gender gap in vote choice over time is mediated by political attitudes (Manza & Brooks, ”